Actually, this article is quite relevant to this thread in a way... It
highlights how differently we all think (hardwired or not I don't know)
and therefore why this string can go on for ever. I suspect that
different approaches to expressing the abstract stuff of computer
programming suit different ones of us and the way our brains work.
http://www.grandin.com/references/thinking.animals.html
Cheers again
John T
Judy Perry wrote:
And, indeed, I think that THAT's the hallmark of the 'seductive'
environment of which Dan speaks.
It seems to be, of necessity, a carrot and stick thing: something draws
you in makes you happy/productive, and then willing to conquer the stick.
Judy
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, J. Landman Gay wrote:
I had to smile at this, mostly because I remember you going through it.
Congrats, Garrett, you've crossed over. :) Your learning curve was
pretty classic. First you hate it, then you start to see possibilities,
then you "get it", then the world's your oyster. Takes a few weeks, but
is well worth it.
But as Greg says, not everyone wants to be a programmer. I'm not sure
how Rev could dumb itself down enough to do what Greg wants without any
programming at all. I think Media with its templates is a step in the
right direction, but Rev is definitely a programming environment and
without at least some scripting it can only do so much.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
