I should have removed the attribution since these get confusing in
multiple quotes and my email client is configured to not
attributions. Case in point: if you look carefully, there was a > in
front of it, which means that yours was the text with >>, an earlier
attribution (now one more > should be added for each since they are
quoted again).
Hi Robert,
Just to note, the quoted text you attributed to me was not something
which I said. I believe it was Troy.
On 7/12/06, Robert Brenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Jul 11, 2006, at 10:02 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
The other issue is regarding maintenance and readability for OTHER
programmers. If there's this arcane 'other' way of doing something, it
may make it more difficult.
But this is a case where the syntax exist with Rev NOW, but not
within this context.
It is REALLY at odds with itself when...
local x = 5 // is legal, and perfectly normal
x = 5 // is not, and is an unthinkable construction
Not really at odds. Within the local statement, the equal holds
always since only string or number can be on the right side. In the
latter case, it would be an operator which can have any expression on
the right.
In terms of implementation, the former is fairly trivial but the
latter would require quite a big change in the parser logic, me
thinks.
Robert
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
