Rob,
I think the point being made is that no, it wouldn't, and it also would
not break any of your SDB code.
Your example of:
set the disabled of button "Previous Record" to (recordNumber = 1)
Would still work, because the script parser/compiler could easily
determine that "(recordNumber = 1)" is an expression, and use of the
"=" operator in an expression would still evaluate to "true / false".
Allowing a single line to read:
x = 5
In no way implies that any code would necessarily be broken anywhere
else. It would JUST allow that statement. Of course an overhaul of the
whole use of "=" could affect tons of code, but it's not necessary in
order to just support the single-line assignment construct.
Sorry,now I've lost focus.
The proposal to have the Rev engine interpret "x=5" to mean "put 5
into x" instead of its current interpertation, "does x equal 5?" would
break existing syntax.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
