Mark... I think your summary is correct.
Dan On 7/22/06, Mark Schonewille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dan, If you interprete me saying that the languages themselves are copyrighted, then I am probably wrong, but you really can't reverse engineer Apple's HyperTalk engine or SuperCard's compiler, not to mention Revolution's. If you want to be really sure, though, read the licenses and take copyright laws into account. Best, Mark P.S. This is my last post regarding this subject, as I feel this is off-topic and I am not an expert in copyright issues. -- Economy-x-Talk Consultancy and Software Engineering http://economy-x-talk.com http://www.salery.biz Download ErrorLib at http://economy-x-talk.com/developers.html and get full control of error handling in Revolution. Op 22-jul-2006, om 20:13 heeft Dan Shafer het volgende geschreven: > Mark... > > Are you sure? Copyrighting language syntax is pretty tricky stuff > and I'm > not at all sure that ANY of those *languages* was ever so protected > or is > now. > > I'm not saying you're wrong, just wondering what your source of such > certainty is. > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dan Shafer, Information Product Consultant and Author http://www.shafermedia.com Get my book, "Revolution: Software at the Speed of Thought"
From http://www.shafermediastore.com/tech_main.html
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
