Recently, Bridger Maxwell wrote: > Is it possible to have two handlers, and to call the second handler from > within the first handler, and have the first handler keep executing without > waiting for the second handler to finish?
This depends on what you're doing in the second handler. You might be able to do something like this: on Handler1 send "doHandler2" to me in 0 millisecs -- TO START QUICKLY beep end Handler1 on doHandler2 doSomeStuffThatTakesALongTime end doHandler2 ...but you'll have to test to see if this works for you. What you're trying to do is threading, and while Revolution does not inherently provide any means for threaded events, using "send in..." can sometimes accomplish similar results. Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, Multimedia & Design ----- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.tactilemedia.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
