I wouldn't mind so much if they wanted to call it "RevTalk" or something else. But making the scripting language name identical to the whole product is not something I can say is prudent, just out of sake of clarity/precision.
Dan Shafer wrote > And, to answer your opening question, Runtime Revolution is trying hard to > get us to call the language Revolution. I'm resisting and I suspect lots > of > other folks are as well. I consider that a silly and ill-advised > terminology > change. But in their official literature, it's now Revolution which you > program in...er...Revolution. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
