Mark Smith wrote:
On 10 Sep 2006, at 16:26, Richard Gaskin wrote:
So until someone can demonstrate otherwise, I'm sticking with using
fields to strip tags from text.....
Though doesn't this approach fail with legitimate "<" characters in
<code> (or other) tags?
Of course, that may not be important in your usage.
It's very important for most of us, since we're looking for the most
robust solution.
I just tried it and found that this:
<pre>
put 2<3
</pre>
...produces an incomplete rendering like this:
put 2
...but this:
<pre>
put 2< 3
</pre>
...is rendered as expected like this:
put 2< 3
I would imagine similar results if we special-case the regex solution to
also handle non-white space after a "<".
If both methods are equally robust then the one to use would be the
fastest. But if one of more fault-tolerant than the other, than if the
speed of both is at least acceptable than I'd go with the more robust one.
--
Richard Gaskin
Managing Editor, revJournal
_______________________________________________________
Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
