On 9/12/06 7:04 PM, "Ken Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think > there's a downside to always using "do" when you have a long ID as a > reference, other than that it takes slightly longer to process because it > needs to interpret it on the fly (which really only shows itself when you > have it in a loop).
Long IDs of objects can break when owners change, so the "do" could fail. So could other techniques that rely on the long id. Some time ago some folks talked about using a rugged id, that's insensitive to changes in the group hierarchy. If you'd like to see a resulting getprop uRuggedID, let me know. -- Dick _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
