Robert, though this has nothing to do with type-checking, you can
initialise variables to whatever you like when you declare them, so
global gAGlobal = empty
local aLocal = null
Best,
Mark
On 5 Oct 2006, at 08:47, Robert Sneidar wrote:
I think this underscores the need for REAL type checking. I was
told that a positive integer would return true if "is a date" is used.
As easy as non-typed variables are, it often becomes necessary to
check for such things. I for one would like to be able to have the
option of having new global variables initialized with NULL or
UNDEFINED or something, so that I can check for the first time
initialization of said variables. Maybe there could be an addition
to the global/local variable declaration so that if you include an
arguement and the variable is undefined as of yet, it will
initialize the variable with your arguement as in:
global bobtest "NULL"
If bobtest already exists it will leave it as is, but if not it
will initialize it with the string "NULL" or whatever you tell it to.
<sigh> if only I ruled the world...
Bob Sneidar
IT Manager
Logos Management
Calvary Chapel CM
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
