<blush>
Erm, anyone tried (on a duplicate of course) renaming a .rev file
to .html and opening it in a browser? Looks interesting...
Cheers,
Luis.
Viktoras Didziulis wrote:
As we all know stacks in Rev are binary files with scripts as
text. My
question would be is there a preferred [proper, accepted] way or any
guidelines to describe RunRev projects' source so it could be
searched as a
whole and imported into ReunRev RAD directly? Or should we put
extra efforts
by rewriting the code manually so it could be searched by search
engines and
leave it for developers to translate it to RunRev manually again?
This is
not so attractive for the both sides and requires additional
efforts by
those who want to share and those who would like to reuse the
shared code. There is a brilliant idea Luis just wrote about -it
indeed would be nice to
have RunRev cards and stacks (not compiled) to be described in XML
that
could be directly imported into the RunRev RAD and/or searched by
search
engines. I guess someone at Runtime Ltd or maybe outside has to
define the
XML syntax to be used and create an XML/Transcript source code
import/export
tool with existing RunRev tools. Should we try ;-) it is worth
efforts.
Best wishes Viktoras -------Original Message------- From: Mark
Wieder Date: 10/06/06 08:11:04 To: [email protected]
Subject: Google Code Search All- I just got pointed to Google
Code Search today. Looks like a great online tool. There's no
xtalk in their otherwise great selection of programming languages,
but they're open to suggestions (there's a feedback link)...
http://www.google.com/codesearch
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
