Hi,
As far as I am concerned, I have fields whose textStyle is set to
link, but I am using the mouseUp however.
The reason why I am using the link textStyle for some fields is that
I think the user understand immediately that the lines are clickable.
Up to now, I did not notice that there was a linkClicked
message :-))). Always learning; thanks !
So one can have :
- some fields whose the textStyle is set to link and use either
"linkclicked" or mouseUp message
- and of course, other fields where only certain groups of chars are
set to link and then use "linkclicked" message (well, now I will use
it :-))
Best regards from Grenoble
André
Le 3 nov. 06 à 00:34, Mark Schonewille a écrit :
Hi,
First of all, I wonder why one would set the textStyle of an entire
field to link? I would handle the mouseUp message instead. This may
be my own personal view, but it is easier because you can modify a
smaller amount of properties to make it work, it also gives you
more freedom to alter something afterwards.
The docs say about linkClicked: "Sent when the user clicks grouped
text." If you set the style of a field to "bold" and enter text,
the text looks bold, but it isn't. If you request for its style by
entering "put the textStyle of char 1 of fld 1" in the message box,
you should get an empty value returned.
When you click on a text, Revolution doesn't check the textStyle of
the field but the textStyle of the text. Since the textStyle is
empty, the linkClicked message is not sent.
I understand that everybody who doesn't agree will say it is far-
fetched, but I think this is a valid explantion and thus I doubt
this is a bug. Then again, I probably wouldn't mind if this
behaviour were changed, because I won't set the textStyle of a
field to link anyway.
Best regards,
Mark
--
Economy-x-Talk
Consultancy and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Get your store on-line within minutes with Salery Web Store
software. Download at http://www.salery.biz
-------Original Message------- From: Timothy Miller Date:
11/02/06 21:42:05 To: How to use Revolution Subject: Link text
style -- bug or feature ? This arises from a question I asked on
the forum, then solved on my own, by trial and error. If I set
the textstyle of a field to "link," by script or manually, text
entered into that field looks like a link. It's blue and
underlined. However, it doesn't act like a link. When clicked it
sends a mouseUp, not a linkClicked. If I select the text, the
"text" menu has a checkmark by "Plain," not by "Link" Maybe it's
a bug. If not, I don't understand the point of being able to set
the textstyle of a field to "link" and make the text look
misleadingly like a link, if it's not a link. The field
inspector is ambiguous in this regard. The button that sets the
style to "link" is marked with a "G" presumably for group. The
tool tip says "Link text" That's ambiguous, too. Does it mean
"set the style of text in this field to 'link'"? or does it mean
"Link the text in this field"? Maybe linking in this way affects
the mousechunk function, and is intended for use with a mouseUp,
not with a linkClicked. I haven't investigated that possibility
yet. The user dictionary doesn't really settle the matter
either. As things stand, it seems that "link" is a textStyle in
one context -- if you select text and set the style of the text
to link, but not in another -- if you set the textstyle of the
field to "link" I alread BZ'd this. I probably should'a asked
here first. Comments welcome. Tim
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
