Hi,
I vote for the simplest which is just to have a large build number as
in:
6.5.1.8759 Meaning Version 6.5.1 Build 8759 from the very first
V1.0.0.1 Build!
It's way easier to back track problems that way.
All the Best
Dave
On 15 Nov 2006, at 03:06, Richard Gaskin wrote:
While each person who's replied has a different preference for how
the build number is displayed, on incrementing they all seem to be
in agreement that it should be reset with version number changes
rather than incremented in perpetuity across all versions for the
life of the product.
That reflects my own preference as sell, and apparently Scott
Raney's as he used a similar system.
Thanks Bill, Sean, and Paul for chiming in.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
___________________________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
