On 17 Nov 2006, at 00:19, Bernard Devlin wrote:
>>
The thing is that depending on the context "me" is evaluated
differently, so all the different tests etc. don't really count for
much, except that they evaluate ok in *that* context or they don't.
The tests you did are just red herrings since they change the context
of how "me" is evaluated.
<<
I don't think my tests change the context at all. I was looking at
what the value of "me" was inside the handlers you put forward.
And I pointed out that there were further strange factors involved
here. Those factors might well help us to find out why this
strange behaviour occurs.
The context is dependent on the compiled TranScript statements that
drive the engine and how/where the shareText property is interpreted/
acted upon.
You have shown no interest in investigating this bug.
I spent at least a week on this problem back in Feb/Mar and so did
a lot of other professional RunRev's on this this list.
I was looking to find out more information so that it could be
added to a bug report in order that this bug might be fixed. You
have not logged this as bug,
Richard has already logged it as you have pointed out.
not voted for it when it was logged as a bug,
How do you know that?
not answered when people have asked if it was bugzilla-ed, and not
shown any interest in investigating further what is happening
How do you suggest I "investigate further" what is happening??
, yet you are the one who brought it up again to bolster your
allegations about how fundamentally buggy Rev is.
No, I brought it up because I wanted to inform people that this
problem existed and I wanted to see if anyone had had further
thoughts on it and also because since the topic of a bug-fix release
came up and it seems that RunRev is committed to doing just that and
I have been asking for that for ages.
There are lots of other bugs too, especially in the IDE. I would like
them to be fixed. That's it.
I find it ironic that someone claims that he is not buying
updates to Rev and cannot 'sell' Rev to other people because of
alleged bugs, yet that same person can't be bothered to make use of
the bug-squashing system, and can't be bothered to further
investigate bugs that are supposedly causing him such fundamental
problems.
Just look at the dates that the bugs were reported and look at the
number of "enhancements" that have been added.
I just wish you'd stop getting your knickers in such a twist, it does
no one any good.
All the Best
Dave
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
