Hi,

Well, I was thinking leave the explicit forms as they are as at least you can do a global find on "msg" or "messagebox", but you can't search for the shorthand version without hitting every put in the whole stack(s).

All the Best
Dave


On 1 Dec 2006, at 12:52, Mark Smith wrote:

Me too...

Thinking aloud, as it were, would a handler like this work?

on checkScript pScript
  repeat for each line L in pScript
    add 1 to lineCount
if "put" is in L AND "into" is not in L then put lineCount & comma after possibleProblems
  end repeat
 put possibleProblems
end checkScript

I guess we'd need to consider "into msg" and "into message" etc... as well as "before", "after" and so on...

If we had a completely reliable version, we could even have it comment out those lines.

Or has anyone already done this?

Mark

On 1 Dec 2006, at 11:36, Dave wrote:

put the scaledScore["memoryforstories"] of field "data1" into msg

Has got me before now! They can be sooooo hard to find when you are writing lots of stuff to the message box for debugging, and then forget to delete just one of them! This is especially true in a library stack, I had a rouge "put xxx" in a library that took me ages to track down, I eventually found it in a in function a few levels away from the main API Call!

I think an option that turned off the "put xxx" shortcut would be a good idea!

All the Best
Dave


_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to