Richard, > Is there a plan to adopt the more common industry convention of simply > "Development", "Alpha", "Beta", "Gamma", "Release"?
We already are using the "Beta" label as the "public" naming scheme for releases. But in the immediate future, the "dp" internal naming system is not going to go away. It's baked into the "build tools" used to create releases. I suspect, for example, that "Beta 2" will be named "dp-3, build NNN." The build tools otherwise work reliably, and all resources are being directed to the Revolution product itself. For now we'll just have to wrap our heads around each release having three numbers: Beta #, dp #, and build #. If it helps, you might think of it the way that Rev buttons can have a label, a name, an ID number, and an ordinal number. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
