On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:23:16 -0800, Mark Wieder wrote: > Chipp- > > Saturday, January 20, 2007, 6:57:21 AM, you wrote: > >> 'avoid time wasting confusion', then why even allow controls or >> objects with >> the same name? > > Yep - this has bothered me for a long time, too. I'd certainly support > a referendum to disallow objects with the same name, but I'm afraid it > would break backward compatibility. VB supports object instancing in > the form of group "America"[2], but I don't care much for the syntax.
Maybe if there was an "instance" property of an object, so you could do: put the number of instances of group "America" put 10 into field 1 of instance 1 of group "America" put the long id of instance 2 of group "America" into tID (etc.) Just a thought... Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software, Inc. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
