Does this mean, based on past history, that when we have an upgrade we should keep our copy of the old one we've been using around for a while? I thought Revolution was mature enough that we can count on upgrades to be "good". Apparently, not! Since I got a good window's standalone using 2.7.4, but didn't using 2.8 gm3, should I go back and do it again using 2.7.4? Since I may not have kept that version around, how can I get a copy to try that out?

Joe Wilkins

On Feb 26, 2007, at 4:06 PM, Mark Powell wrote:

Never cease to be amazed how something functioning in an earlier version can break so freely in upgrades. Who is minding the store, anyhow? And
if it was broken between 2.7.2 and 2.7.5 (as reported by Trevor), any
excuse why it wasn't remedied in 2.8?    Aargh.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trevor
DeVore
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 12:52 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Itemization of detailed files changed in v 2.8?

On Feb 26, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Mark Powell wrote:

In 2.8, I am getting modification dates of 1969 due to the zero in
item 5.  Is anyone else seeing this, or am I just hallucinating
(again)?

http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=4474

--
Trevor DeVore
Blue Mango Learning Systems
www.bluemangolearning.com    -    www.screensteps.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to