On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 00:55:31 +0200, Mark Smith wrote: > > On 1 Apr 2007, at 00:03, Cal Horner wrote: > >> It just seems funny that a simple control that has become such a >> standard in >> the building of interfaces, should be "hidden" within a complex object. > > In what sense are groups (as described by Ken) complex? Of course, > you can nest groups, which can become complex if you want.
I don't think he meant "complex" in that manner - I think he meant that the "frame" wasn't an object in and of itself - that it was something that you needed to make multiple settings changes to get it to behave as a frame. Other languages just have a "frame object" that you drag and drop onto a form (card). If I'm wrong, Cal, please don't hesitate to correct me. Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software, Inc. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
