On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:48 AM, Dave wrote:

I tried that, but it doesn't work, at least in RunRev 2.8.0.370 on Intel Mac it doesn't. Given the following setup:

01  GroupA
02    GroupB                                    (Inside GroupA)
03       Object1OfGroupB
04       Object1OfGroupB
05       Object1OfGroupB
06     GroupC                                   (Inside GroupA)
07       Object1OfGroupC
08       Object1OfGroupC
09       Object1OfGroupC
10     GroupD                                   (Inside GroupA)
11       Object1OfGroupD
12       Object1OfGroupD
13       Object1OfGroupD


14  GroupE  (not in a Group)


If I set the later of GroupE to 1, it becomes layer 1 and GroupA becomes layer 2. If I set the layer of GroupE to 2, it becomes layer 2 (inside GroupB) and all the other object layers increase by one.

Dave,

I just tried the setup you have above and it worked. I started with the following:

GroupA
    GroupB
        Control
        Control
    GroupC
        Control
        Control
    GroupD
        Control
        Control
GroupE
    Control

I then ran this code:

set the layer of group "GroupE" to the layer of group "GroupA" + 1
set the layer of group "GroupD" to the layer of group "GroupA" + 1
set the layer of group "GroupC" to the layer of group "GroupA" + 1
set the layer of group "GroupB" to the layer of group "GroupA" + 1

and ended up with this:

GroupA
    GroupB
        Control
        Control
    GroupC
        Control
        Control
    GroupD
        Control
        Control
    GroupE
        Control

I can send you an example stack if you wish.

--
Trevor DeVore
Blue Mango Learning Systems
www.bluemangolearning.com    -    www.screensteps.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to