On Apr 9, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Trevor wrote:
the text property of an image is the actual image data. So:
set the text of image "testImage" to tJPGData
Then Mark Wieder wrote:
This is one of those cases where I feel the language loses its
intuitiveness... I know you have to do this, but it makes absolutely
no sense to me.
Wasn't "the contents" the same as "the text" at one time? I was sure
it was so, but I just tested it and "the contents" of an image
returns empty, whereas "the text" does not. But I'm sure that once
upon a time—maybe in Metacard days—it was a synonym. Am I nuts? Does
anyone else remember this?
Even if it wasn't ever the case, it ought to be.
I'm with Mark. Referring to "the text" of an image makes absolutely
no sense to me.
t
--
Tereza Snyder
Califex Software, Inc.
www.califexsoftware.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
