Hi,
You could also just initialize x to something greater than zero...
Yes, I have to pre-initialize x (or whatever), that's the problem. I
end up having to initialize the variable (or whatever) initially and
then again inside the loop. In the this case it's trivial, but when
the condition is more complex and when there are a lot of nested
repeats it gets really messy.
All the Best
Dave
On 18 Apr 2007, at 11:36, Mark Smith wrote:
You could also just initialize x to something greater than zero...
Best,
Mark
On 18 Apr 2007, at 11:02, Dave wrote:
Hi,
I've just finished coding one of the most complicated multiple
loops I've ever had to do! I must say that the amount of code that
I had to write could have been cut down quite a lot if RunRev had
a do <this> repeat while statement.
In C the syntax is:
while (x > 0)
{
do these statements
}
Which in RunRev is roughly equivalent to:
repeat while x > 0
do these statements
end repeat
But C also has this structure:
do
{
do these statements
}
while (x > 0)
which AFAIK doesn't have a RunRev equivalent.
Would be so nice to have something like:
dorepeat
do these statements
dorepeat while x > 0
So whatever syntax works better!
All the Best
Dave
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
