> A problems with using arrays like that is that i will shuffle the lines > around somewhat randomly. Also note that my approach is about 7 times > faster (not sure if it's the itemDelimiter stuff, or the array handling > itself that is slower).
I find that the array method as shown by Mark will work a bit faster than the replace delimeters method, but you have to use a data list of about 10,000 to see the difference. At 50000 lines of data, the replace takes 9-10 ticks, and the array method takes 6-7 ticks. At 4000 lines, both will show 0 ticks elapsed, which means less than half a tick. Tick is about 1/60th of a second. Mac G5 Duo, Rev 2.7.2 build 261 Jim Ault Las Vegas On 5/5/07 9:28 AM, "Björnke von Gierke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I always found arrays to be confusing, that's why I prefer this method : > > on mouseUp > put "Arb.rec:0=234:1=456789:2=657483:3=4:4=3456473:5=1:6=0: " & CRLF > into x > replace ":" with return in x > replace "=" with space in x > put line 2 to -2 of x > end mouseUp > > A problems with using arrays like that is that i will shuffle the lines > around somewhat randomly. Also note that my approach is about 7 times > faster (not sure if it's the itemDelimiter stuff, or the array handling > itself that is slower). > > have fun > Björnke > > On 05 May 2007, at 16:46, Mark Smith wrote: > >> This works for the given string, and should be quick even with 999 >> values: >> >> on mouseUp >> put "Arb.rec:0=234:1=456789:2=657483:3=4:4=3456473:5=1:6=0: " & CRLF >> into tRec >> set the itemDelimiter to ":" >> delete item 1 of tRec >> delete item -1 of tRec >> >> split tRec by ":" and "=" >> combine tRec by cr and space -- (or tab, if you prefer) >> put tRec >> end mouseUp >> >> Best, >> >> Mark >> >> On 5 May 2007, at 11:18, Camm29 wrote: >> >>> Hi , >>> >>> I'm using read from socket >>> >>> example reply , can be max 999 values. >>> >>> >>> Arb.rec:0=234:1=456789:2=657483:3=4:4=3456473:5=1:6=0: CRLF >>> >>> I wish to display in a updating field with the values shown as , >>> >>> 0 234 >>> 1 456789 >>> 2 657483 >>> 3 4 >>> 4 3456473 >>> 5 1 >>> 6 0 >>> >>> I must be missing something , i used a repeat but its very slow on >>> updating ? >>> >>> Thanks in advance >>> Camm _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
