On 05/13/2007 at 10:16 AM "Viktoras Didziulis" wrote: > It is likely to prevent somebody using Revolution studio to create a > competing RAD environment. Unfortunately this also prevents from > implementing any kind of scripting, or complex formula translations which > would not compete with the RAD in any way. Therefore in order to implement > end-user scripting for own products (like allowing user to create decision > trees with formulas in nodes) some of us have to resort to other languages > via shell or SQL92/95 as alternatives. I guess the most efficient way is to > use SQL because of its tight integration with Revolution through its > database modules. > > Best! > Viktoras
Shouldn't this limitation be obsoleted? I had read once that RunTime had no fear of a competing IDE, and in fact, they incourage it. It was explained that a license to the engine is still required, so RunTime would still benefit from sales. This ancient 10 line limit is well, "limiting" us as developers. Do any of Revs competing languages have such a limit imposed on built standalone apps? Roger Eller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
