Just to say at this stage that I find this whole effort most welcome. Of course, despite Ken's caveats, we must all be itching to suggest additions to the library (file handling, tables and printing would be on my list). I can see that the group has to think very carefully about which direction to go in: in fact it probably already has a policy about being generally useful and not esoteric as Ken says. One issue is whether to allow code that makes up for perceived deficiencies in Rev's functionality or implementation (to me, the table object is the obvious example here). Where would the best place be to discuss this kind of thing?

Anyway, renewed congratulation on the announcement.

Graham

On Thu, 10 May 2007 16:31:26 -0500, Ken Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hello everyone!

This message is to announce that the RevInterop group
(http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/revInterop/) have been working on a
"Standard Library" for Revolution and a beta version of the library is
now available. This library, called "stdLib.rev" contains a variety of
useful functions
and commands that the initial working group felt
were very useful for anyone programming in Revolution. However the main issue is not the actual code, but whether the first pass at the library
has a good "core" set of handlers and functions for developers to use.

The full list of functions/commands, along with a place for providing
your feedback is at the following Wiki page on the Sons of Thunder web
site:

http://www.sonsothunder.com/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Main.RevolutionStdLib

If you are interested in reviewing the handlers in this library, please
go to the Wiki and add your comments. Just a note of caution, though:
I'm sure many of you will see what you might
consider "glaring omissions" or are wondering just why certain handlers were included. Please keep in mind that (a) this is a first public pass at the library, and (b) we don't want to load the library up with a lot
of useful, although esoteric, handlers. Of course, that is up to this
group to work through, so please provide whatever feedback you feel is
appropriate.

The end result of this effort will (hopefully) be a common library of
handlers that
both experienced developers and newcomers can start to use in their
development efforts; it may also help RunRev answer the question about
why there isn't a standard library for Revolution like there is in other
languages... :-)
[...]
----------------------------------------
Graham Samuel / The Living Fossil Co. / UK and France

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to