And an even warmer thank you to RunRev for incorporating at least 100 new enhancements into the 2.9 release!
(FYI: that's not a slander or flame... it's my "hope" for the future) I have to say that I was more happy with this open beta then the last one. The main reason, I was actually asked for a list of my top 5 bugs that I want to see resolved. That gave me a voice, and I didn't have to spend my time trying to get people to vote for my bug. AND, the #1 bug on my list was resolved, again (long story). I, personally, find that determining priority for bugs should not be based on how many votes a bug or enhancement may have, and for this specific reason (mind you, I'm in the USA): If there were 1,879 candidates in an election, nearly all of the voters will be unhappy with the elected candidate. I would prefer that bugs and enhancements would be handled like this: - Bugs that are determined to be critical (like crashes and destroyed data) would be handled first, and, resolved for free. - Bugs and Enhancements that are not critical would be taken care of on a first come/first serve basis, with status reports at least once a month. But other than that, I'm really liking the way things are going with Rev. Every year the program gets stronger, and I'm not unhappy with that in the least. Derek Bump Dreamscape Software http://www.dreamscapesoftware.com Joel Guillod wrote: > A warm thank you very much to Runrev for having fixed more than 240 bugs. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
