On 6/3/07, Joe Lewis Wilkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now this is something I think we need to worry about less than having a "Classic" potential; since most people who have OSX are going to be moving up to the latest due to the ease with which Apple makes updating the OS. Or am I in the minority when I get automatic updates from Apple on just about everything whenever there is new software? I'd be willing to bet that there are many, many fewer using OSX 2.8 than are using OS9.2.
I notice that an increasing number of applications list their requirements as 10.4.x It used to be that 10.2.8 was the cutoff. As far as I am concerned, I just want to know what I should list as the minimum system needed to run my programs: does 10.3 still work OK? Sarah _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
