The really terrible part of this is that the common interfaces that we know and love aren't all that usable. There are substantially better (or should I say "well founded and researched") methods of interfacing, but they require a learning curve due to insimilarity with what we know already know. Said learning curve removes any benefit, leaving us back with "what I already use is the best solution for me".
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/6/2007 9:36 AM >>> >Randy Will wrote: > > What all this comes down to is that "ease of use" is in the eye > > of the beholder. >In many areas I would have to agree, but this need not be the case. >There was a time when usability was more the result of research findings >than marketing slogans. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
