On 6/6/07, Samuel M. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem I have with runrev is not open source per se but that with a paid model the incentive is for the developer to release "feature" updates that sound good to justify paying upgrade fees but that for the most part are not nearly as valuable to a developer as maintaining stable quality code. Mature open source on the other hand has the opposite incentive, stable code and only add features that people are willing to invest time in to get so you get a different evolution of features over time.
Brilliant. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
