On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:32:27 +0100, Peter Alcibiades wrote: > End of the day, you can call me and my platform all the names you want. > Half-baked, hobbyist, socialist, whatever. Doesn't help a bit. > > Bottom line is, we're two releases back and incompatible formats. I've > signed up twice now for non-existent betas and once bought a package that > didn't exist. If this isn't going to be a cross platform product for Linux > that is kept up to date, we need to find one that is. No hard > feelings, not > complaining, just let us know. > > Pretty simple really. Nothing to do with pros and hobbyists or OSS. If I > were dependent on it for a living, I'd say the same. More so. As it > is I do > have people dependent on it and was a bit worried before this discussion > started up. Having read the attitudes here, time to start rewriting. Oh > well.
Hey, Peter... the 2.9 build is heavily focused on Linux to make up for all the lost time and to get the Linux build in parity with the Mac and Windows builds. I know RunRev is committed to it (I was just at their offices a few weeks ago). So give it a little while longer - you should be pleasantly surprised... Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software, Inc. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
