On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:27:10 +0100, Mark Smith wrote: > But doesn't that kind of interfere with the point of explicitVars? I > mean that if you have a typo somewhere (myVat instead of myVar, for > example), does your stack then add a "local myVat" as well as a > "local myVar" declaration?
Absolutely! :-) I don't develop with explicitVars turned on either, so the original point of this utility stack was to take a stack that was already working properly and make it work in an environment with explicitVars turned on. Of course this was developed in the day when Rev's variable checking could be turned on all the time, which would cause plugins, etc. not to run unless it was turned off (or unless they were explicitVars-compliant). Now, Rev only turns on variable checking when you go to close/compile the script; otherwise it is left off (so the usefulness of this stack is limited). Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software, Inc. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
