Ken Ray wrote:

The problem is that there is a discontiguous selection at all. The original recipe was with multipleHilites set to true, but nonContiguousHilites left in its original state (which is false), which should mean that you can only make a *contiguous* selection.

Thanks for clarifying.

Yes, confirmed here: it is as though the nonContiguousHilites property has no effect once a field loses focus.

Bug it as "Critical", IMO. While most of the lists I use allow discontiguous selection, continguous-only selection is common enough that one should expect it to be well supported.

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 ___________________________________________________________
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]       http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to