jbv wrote:
Richard Gaskin a *crit :
jbv wrote:
> A good compromise would be to have transcript implemented inside a browser;
> then HTML + CSS + Transcript would be a much more exciting approach...
In principle, yes. In practice, maybe not so much:
<http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution/2006-November/089327.html>
yes, I know this plugin idea has been already discussed at length, and frankly
I'm not
100% sure I know what I'm talking about, but I've always had the feeling that
an open
source browser project like Firefox could have been a good opportunity to
introduce
Transcript as an alternative to js. Of course, it should have been available in
the
downloadable package from the beginning. Only FF users would have benefit this
plugin, but at least it would have attracted attention to Transcript for
millions of FF
users (or at least a large portion of them).
If the Rev engine were open source this might begin to become a possibility.
But in the meantime, as a plugin the main barriers aren't technical but
social/psychological, as my notes at the referenced link outlined.
--
Richard Gaskin
Managing Editor, revJournal
_______________________________________________________
Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
