I have found the possibility of making a variable typing error is almost nil, but the primary reason for this is that I almost never type variable names. (except the first time :-)

It is faster and 100% accurate for me to use a feature I contributed to Galaxy called "ScriptPaint" to "paint" your variable names from existing instances rather than type them. (hover your cursor over a variable name (assuming you see it in your window) and press Cntrl- Space to add it to the line you're typing)

Even with the mouse movement it is usually faster than typing, especially if you tend to use longer, more descriptive variable names. Adding to the speed benefit is the ability to paint other words, commands, keywords, anything visible.

ScriptPaint is so cool I wish every text editor had it- I sometimes try to use ScriptPaint when writing an email, posting on a website, etc.!

I showed ScriptPaint to a RealBasic programmer once and he flipped out. That feature (among others) is making him consider adding Rev to his lineup.

Anyway, I agree declaring vars is a waste of time and makes scripts harder to read and navigate.


On Jun 29, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:

On 6/29/07, Ken Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 over the years of not declaring xTalk
variables I have gotten to the point that the likelihood of me making
an error in typing a variable is extremely low, so there really is very
little benefit and a lot of extra hassle for me to start declaring
them.

I'm with Ken. I don't declare variables and have spent so many hours working
this way, it's just easier. I rarely if ever find a problem from not
declaring vars, and the overhead of the typing and visual clutter is a
nuisance and a time waste to me.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to