On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:13:32 +0100, Mark Smith wrote: > The 'repeat for' is generally a lot faster then the 'repeat with', > but in a case like this with only a few iterations, it wouldn't make > a noticable difference. But with long lists, it can really make a > huge difference.
Also keep in mind that in a script like this, you're "touching" a field (manipulating its contents) every iteration through the loop, which will slow it down anyway. So even if you had 1000 fields on a card I doubt you'd gain much with "repeat for each" vs. "repeat with". Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software, Inc. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
