Arthur Rann wrote:
Of course, I tried removing this, that, and the other, until I was
left with a single card, with no scripts, no custom properties, nada.
At that point, it was exactly the same as a blank, empty project.
Except the name.
The name was set to 'test.rev', which is the correct name of the
stack. On a whim, I changed it to get rid of the '.rev' at the end, in
the stack properties. I saved it, and it 'stuck'. I built, and wow--it
builds!
Okay, that makes some sense to me. You can refer to a stack in a script
by either its short name (the one in stack properties) or by its file
path. Apparently the engine assumes that a stack name with an extension
is a file path on disk. I can see how this might mess up the standalone
builder, which probably always assumes that the short name is never a
disk-based reference.
Stack names in the property inspector should never include an extension,
I suspect.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
