On 10/16/07, Stephen Barncard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The fact remains that it is up to the one between the keyboard and > the seat to do most 'conversion' from HC to Revolution. But this is > not a bad thing.
I fully agree. Lets face it, in the grand scheme of things what could be easier than converting HC to Rev... HC to RealBasic => no, HC to Xcode => definitely NOT, HC to Java => forget it, HC to C++ => not in my lifetime. And whilst being able to drag a HC stack onto Rev and have it open 100% converted would be a nice dream, to me it's a bit like saying "I wish my 07 Ford Mustang was like the good old Model T - you could work on it and fix anything, not all this complicated fuel injection and electronic engine management" Yeah and no aircon, and no power steering and no performance etc etc etc. Yes, whilst the process of conversion may be tedious, I'm with Stephen in that, in the end, you'll have better code, better functionality, better performance and learned ALOT about Rev along the way. For the Inventive user, I'll guarantee their horizons will be expanded to all sorts of 'creations' not possible in HC. Lastly, there is a 100% comprehensive list of all HC conversion pitfalls and remedies...You're on it ;-) _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
