Thanks for you message! I will consider so

On Tue 15. Apr 2025 at 11:44, Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Salva,
>
> The easiest way to deal with this is to rename the fields and schemas.
> This is best done with an alias containing the previous name: that way, the
> new schema can safely read the old data. I understand however, that this
> does not scale due to the size of your system.
>
> A second way is to use your own NameValidator implementation (or
> NameValidator.NO_VALIDATION, though I'd recommend against that) when
> parsing the schemas. This works with the (deprecated) Schema.Parser, and
> I'm planning to revise that code to work with the new SchemaParser as well.
>
> Kind regards,
> Oscar
>
>
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 at 16:10, Salvadoruve <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Avro Community,
>>
>> I recently upgraded from Avro 1.11.3 to the new minor version 1.12.0 and
>> ran into an issue with schema parsing. In 1.12.0, it seems there's stricter
>> name validation enforced by the following code in the schema parser:
>>
>> private static final Pattern NAME_PATTERN =
>> Pattern.compile("[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*");
>> static void validateName(String name, boolean allowNamespace) {}
>>
>> This change is causing problems with some of our older schemas, which
>> were registered with names that don’t conform to this pattern (e.g., names
>> with special characters or starting with numbers). These schemas worked
>> fine in 1.11.3, but now they fail to parse in 1.12.0.
>>
>> I have two questions:
>>
>>    1. Is there a workaround to relax this validation or handle these
>>    legacy schemas without renaming them? For context, I’m using the Java SDK,
>>    and modifying all existing schemas isn’t ideal due to the scale of our
>>    system.
>>    2. If no workaround exists, is there any plan to introduce a
>>    compatibility patch or configuration option in a future release to support
>>    parsing schemas with less strict name validation?
>>
>> Any advice or insights would be greatly appreciated! Please let me know
>> if you need more details about my setup or the specific schema names
>> causing issues.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Salva V
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> ✉️ Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <[email protected]>
>
>

Reply via email to