On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > It is starting to concern me that we're trying to design the site by > committee. And design by committee is a terrible way to achieve anything with > cohesion. I'm not sure what to do though. > > The ideal solution would be for us to appoint a designer/webmaster who's sole > responsibility was the design and maintenance of the site. This person could > then take guidance from the community on what should be included, and what > we'd like on the site - but would be free to call the shots, and ultimately > decide how things were going to look. > > Does anyone have any ideas how we can move towards this, and away from the > current situation? Having a bunch of geeks (and we're hardly known for our > design prowess in the first place, right?) argue about what should and should > not be included will lead us head first into the kind of open source website > we all know and hate.
That would be better indeed. But appoint a designer/wemaster or send a public call for a design ? - benoit
