I think lots of folks hate getting prompted by console programs. Thats' why rm has a -f option. And why brave folks do a: alias rm 'rm -f'
On 3/28/06, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/25/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think we all agree that the easier for the user the better. > > > > Having one deploy command smart enough to deploy or redeploy based on the > > current status would be > > cool as Aaron suggested. I think it would also be nice, if the command is > > going to redeploy a > > running app, to have a confirmation message like "... App XYZ already > > running, redeploy? [Y/N]", > > whis this said, a new flag to the command should be added to force a > > response to that command. > > > > I like Hernan's idea about prompting the user. But I would make the > new flag force the redeploy instead of forcing a response. Kinda like > how the "mv" and "rm" commands work: > > $ umask 777 > $ touch foo1 > $ touch foo2 > $ mv foo1 foo2 > mv: overwrite `foo2', overriding mode 0000? n > $ mv -f foo1 foo2 > $ > > > Best wishes, > Paul > -- Regards, Hiram
