On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:12 AM, David Jencks <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Nov 17, 2011, at 6:43 AM, amergey wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Following the anouncement of the beta1 > > > > > > > >> Support SUN's Java Enterprise Edition 6.0 Full Profile specification: > >> .... > >> - JDBC 3.0 > >> ..... > >> For details about Full Profile specifications, please visit Java EE > >> specifications website. > >> > > > > According to Java EE 6 specification website > > ( > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javaee/tech/index-jsp-142185.html), > > JDBC should be 4.0, not 3.0. > > > > Are there any plans to be compliant to JDBC 4 before Geronimo 3 release ? > > Well, the tck passes and I would have thought it was testing JDBC 4. > However the tranql wrappers we use don't support the new methods. I think > it's time that we upgraded tranql to java 6 and added in the new methods. > This will make new tranql releases not work on java 5 (wrong class file > format) but if we need to fix bugs we might try a tranql java 5 branch. > Yes, tranql java 5 branch is required for G 2.x branch future releases. Forrest > > thanks > david jencks > > > > Regards, > > Arnaud > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/JDBC-4-support-in-Geronimo-3-tp3303655p3515979.html > > Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
