I might not have make myself clear, I meant "Most of the focus have been in Geronimo 3.x instead of Geronimo 2.2 branch in community *recently*".
We have provided patches for the HASH-DOS vulnerability. I'm open for a new 2.2.2 release and related discussion for other general issues when Geronimo 3.0 is in a good shape. On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Jun 7, 2012, at 1:24 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: > > > Most of the focus have been in Geronimo 3.x instead of Geronimo 2.2 > branch in community. Do you have any specific requirement that has to be > fulfilled with Geronimo 2.2.x instead of Geronimo 3.x ? > > > > We'd like to hear more voice on if we need to plan a near term Geronimo > 2.2.2 release. > > That doesn't seem like a well-thought out answer… Given the HASH-DOS > security vulnerability and other general issues, there seems to be enough > to merit a 2.2.x release. If the community doesn't want to generate a > release, then seems like we should be discussing dropping support for 2.2.x > (which is something that I would not be in favor of). > > --kevan -- Shawn
