Craig, soon I can increase my cluster and I will let you know okay? For now, it is in production like a test!hehe
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:06 PM, craig w <[email protected]> wrote: > Alfredo -- i'll be curious to hear how it goes if you scale it up. I had > initially tested with 12 nodes and it seemed fine, then when i went to 90 > it became an issue. Again, this was with an older Marathon, so things could > be much better now. > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Alfredo Carneiro < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I've just started to use it on production with 14 nodes and it is scaling >> well! I had no problems yet. And different from haproxy-marathon-bridge, it >> supports natively a loop every second, so you don't have any delay, at >> least I haven't seen. >> >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:23 PM, craig w <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> That was using the marathon-haproxy-bridge script, so it was polling >>> marathon every minute to try and keep up to date. Though a minute lag in >>> updating the proxy wasn't sufficient. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Alfredo Miranda >> > > > > -- > > https://github.com/mindscratch > https://www.google.com/+CraigWickesser > https://twitter.com/mind_scratch > https://twitter.com/craig_links > > -- Alfredo Miranda
