Why not `logstash`? I think it's the target case of `logstash`.

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 7:35 AM Zhitao Li <[email protected]> wrote:

> Great.
>
> I also found this old thread
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/Mesos/0Vlr6meKs116T2k1?subj=Mapped+diagnostics+context+Adding+internal+Mesos+IDs+as+context+to+the+logs
>  on
> dev list, which seems no consensus has been made.
>
> Maybe we can talk about this in the next community sync?
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:25 PM, James Peach <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 19, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Zhitao Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi James,
> >
> > Stitching events together is only one possible use cases, and I'm not
> exactly sure what you meant by directly event logging.
> >
> > Taking the hierarchical allocator for example. In a multi-framework
> cluster, sometimes I want to comb through various loggings and present a
> trace on how allocation has affected a particular framework (by its
> framework id) and/or w.r.t an agent (by its agent id).
> >
> > Being able to systematically extract structured field values like
> framework_id or agent_id, regardless of the actually logging pattern, will
> be tremendously automatically from all lo valuable in such use cases.
>
> I think we are talking about similar things. Many servers do both
> free-form error logging and structured event logging. I'm thinking of event
> logging formats are customizable by the operator and allow the
> interpolation of context-specific data item (eg. HTTP access logs from many
> different server implementations).
>
> J
>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Zhitao Li
>
-- 

Regards,
----
Da (Klaus), Ma (马达), PMP® | Software Architect
IBM Platform Development & Support, STG, IBM GCG
+86-10-8245 4084 | [email protected] | http://k82.me

Reply via email to