The question was posed merely to point out that there is no notion of the
executor "running away" currently, due to the answer I provided: there
isn't a complete lifecycle API for the executor. (This includes
healthiness, state updates, reconciliation, ability for scheduler to shut
it down, etc).

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Mohit Jaggi <[email protected]> wrote:

> Good question.
> - I don't know what the interaction between mesos agent and executor is.
> Is there a health check?
> - There is a reconciliation between Mesos and Frameworks: will Mesos
> include the "orphan" executor in the list there, so framework can find
> runaways and kill them(using Mesos provided API)?
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Benjamin Mahler <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> What defines a runaway executor?
>>
>> Mesos does not know that this particular executor should self-terminate
>> within some reasonable time after its task terminates. In this case the
>> framework (Aurora) knows this expected behavior of Thermos and can clean up
>> ones that get stuck after the task terminates. However, we currently don't
>> provide a great executor lifecycle API to enable schedulers to do this
>> (it's long overdue).
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Mohit Jaggi <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I was asking if this can happen automatically.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Benjamin Mahler <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You can kill it manually by SIGKILLing the executor process.
>>>> Using the agent API, you can launch a nested container session and kill
>>>> the executor. +jie,gilbert, is there a CLI command for 'exec'ing into the
>>>> container?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Mohit Jaggi <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes. There is a fix available now in Aurora/Thermos to try and exit in
>>>>> such scenarios. But I am curious to know if Mesos agent has the
>>>>> functionality to reap runaway executors.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Benjamin Mahler <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is my understanding correct that the Thermos transitions the task to
>>>>>> TASK_FAILED, but Thermos gets stuck and can't terminate itself? The 
>>>>>> typical
>>>>>> workflow for thermos, as a 1:1 task:executor approach, is that the 
>>>>>> executor
>>>>>> terminates itself after the task is terminal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The full logs of the agent during this window would help, it looks
>>>>>> like an agent termination is involved here as well?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Mohit Jaggi <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here are some relevant logs. Aurora scheduler logs shows the task
>>>>>>> going from:
>>>>>>> INIT
>>>>>>> ->PENDING
>>>>>>> ->ASSIGNED
>>>>>>> ->STARTING
>>>>>>> ->RUNNING for a long time
>>>>>>> ->FAILED due to health check error, OSError: Resource temporarily
>>>>>>> unavailable (I think this is referring to running out of PID space, see
>>>>>>> thermos logs below)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --- mesos agent ---
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I1005 22:56:47.902153 127818 fetcher.cpp:285] Fetching directly into 
>>>>>>> the sandbox directory
>>>>>>> I1005 22:56:47.902170 127818 fetcher.cpp:222] Fetching URI 
>>>>>>> '/usr/bin/XXXXX'
>>>>>>> I1005 22:56:47.913270 127818 fetcher.cpp:207] Copied resource 
>>>>>>> '/usr/bin/xxxxx' to 
>>>>>>> '/var/lib/mesos/slaves/b4fff262-c925-4edf-a2ef-2a5bbe89c42b-S1540/frameworks/20160112-010512-421372426-5050-73504-0000/executors/thermos-xxx-2-caa0744d-fffd-446e-9f97-05bd84a32b54/runs/bb904e1d-4c32-4d7a-b1b6-9b3f78ddfe95/xxx'
>>>>>>> I1005 22:56:47.913331 127818 fetcher.cpp:582] Fetched '/usr/bin/xxx' to 
>>>>>>> '/var/lib/mesos/slaves/b4fff262-c925-4edf-a2ef-2a5bbe89c42b-S1540/frameworks/20160112-010512-421372426-5050-73504-0000/executors/thermos-xxx-2-caa0744d-fffd-446e-9f97-05bd84a32b54/runs/bb904e1d-4c32-4d7a-b1b6-9b3f78ddfe95/xxx'
>>>>>>> WARNING: Your kernel does not support swap limit capabilities, memory 
>>>>>>> limited without swap.
>>>>>>> twitter.common.app debug: Initializing: twitter.common.log (Logging 
>>>>>>> subsystem.)
>>>>>>> Writing log files to disk in /mnt/mesos/sandbox
>>>>>>> I1005 22:58:15.677225     7 exec.cpp:162] Version: 1.1.0
>>>>>>> I1005 22:58:15.680867    14 exec.cpp:237] Executor registered on agent 
>>>>>>> b4fff262-c925-4edf-a2ef-2a5bbe89c42b-S1540
>>>>>>> Writing log files to disk in /mnt/mesos/sandbox
>>>>>>> I1006 01:13:52.950552    39 exec.cpp:487] Agent exited, but framework 
>>>>>>> has checkpointing enabled. Waiting 365days to reconnect with agent 
>>>>>>> b4fff262-c925-4edf-a2ef-2a5bbe89c42b-S1540
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --- thermos (Aurora) ----
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1 I1023 19:03:05.765677 52364 fetcher.cpp:582] Fetched '/usr/bin/xxx' 
>>>>>>> to 
>>>>>>> '/var/lib/mesos/slaves/b4fff262-c925-4edf-a2ef-2a5bbe89c42b-S3295/frameworks/20160112-010512-421372426-5050-73504-0000/executors/thermos-xxx-2-d3c1c4d9-4d74-433a-b26a-8a88bb7687b8/runs/982e7236-fccd-40bc-a2a5-d8a1901cf0bf/fxxx'
>>>>>>>  22 WARNING: Your kernel does not support swap limit capabilities, 
>>>>>>> memory limited without swap.
>>>>>>>  23 twitter.common.app debug: Initializing: twitter.common.log (Logging 
>>>>>>> subsystem.)
>>>>>>>  24 Writing log files to disk in /mnt/mesos/sandbox
>>>>>>>  25 I1023 19:04:32.261165     7 exec.cpp:162] Version: 1.2.0
>>>>>>>  26 I1023 19:04:32.264870    42 exec.cpp:237] Executor registered on 
>>>>>>> agent b4fff262-c925-4edf-a2ef-2a5bbe89c42b-S3295
>>>>>>>  27 Writing log files to disk in /mnt/mesos/sandbox
>>>>>>>  28 Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>>>  29   File 
>>>>>>> "/root/.pex/install/twitter.common.exceptions-0.3.7-py2-none-any.whl.f6376bcca9bfda5eba4396de2676af5dfe36237d/twitter.common.exceptions-0.3.7-py2-none-any.whl/twitter/common/exceptions/__init__.py",
>>>>>>>  line 1    26, in _excepting_run
>>>>>>>  30     self.__real_run(*args, **kw)
>>>>>>>  31   File "apache/thermos/monitoring/resource.py", line 243, in run
>>>>>>>  32   File 
>>>>>>> "/root/.pex/install/twitter.common.concurrent-0.3.7-py2-none-any.whl.f1ab836a5554c86d07fa3f075905c95fb20c78dd/twitter.common.concurrent-0.3.7-py2-none-any.whl/twitter/common/concurrent/event_muxer.py",
>>>>>>>  lin    e 79, in wait
>>>>>>>  33     thread.start()
>>>>>>>  34   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 745, in start
>>>>>>>  35     _start_new_thread(self.__bootstrap, ())
>>>>>>>  36 thread.error: can't start new thread
>>>>>>>  37 ERROR] Failed to stop health checkers:
>>>>>>>  38 ERROR] Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>>>  39   File "apache/aurora/executor/aurora_executor.py", line 209, in 
>>>>>>> _shutdown
>>>>>>>  40     propagate_deadline(self._chained_checker.stop, 
>>>>>>> timeout=self.STOP_TIMEOUT)
>>>>>>>  41   File "apache/aurora/executor/aurora_executor.py", line 35, in 
>>>>>>> propagate_deadline
>>>>>>>  42     return deadline(*args, daemon=True, propagate=True, **kw)
>>>>>>>  43   File 
>>>>>>> "/root/.pex/install/twitter.common.concurrent-0.3.7-py2-none-any.whl.f1ab836a5554c86d07fa3f075905c95fb20c78dd/twitter.common.concurrent-0.3.7-py2-none-any.whl/twitter/common/concurrent/deadline.py",
>>>>>>>  line 6    1, in deadline
>>>>>>>  44     AnonymousThread().start()
>>>>>>>  45   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 745, in start
>>>>>>>  46     _start_new_thread(self.__bootstrap, ())
>>>>>>>  47 error: can't start new thread
>>>>>>>  48
>>>>>>>  49 ERROR] Failed to stop runner:
>>>>>>> 50 ERROR] Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>>>  51   File "apache/aurora/executor/aurora_executor.py", line 217, in 
>>>>>>> _shutdown
>>>>>>>  52     propagate_deadline(self._runner.stop, timeout=self.STOP_TIMEOUT)
>>>>>>>  53   File "apache/aurora/executor/aurora_executor.py", line 35, in 
>>>>>>> propagate_deadline
>>>>>>>  54     return deadline(*args, daemon=True, propagate=True, **kw)
>>>>>>>  55   File 
>>>>>>> "/root/.pex/install/twitter.common.concurrent-0.3.7-py2-none-any.whl.f1ab836a5554c86d07fa3f075905c95fb20c78dd/twitter.common.concurrent-0.3.7-py2-none-any.whl/twitter/common/concurrent/deadline.py",
>>>>>>>  line 6    1, in deadline
>>>>>>>  56     AnonymousThread().start()
>>>>>>>  57   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 745, in start
>>>>>>>  58     _start_new_thread(self.__bootstrap, ())
>>>>>>>  59 error: can't start new thread
>>>>>>>  60
>>>>>>>  61 Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>>>  62   File 
>>>>>>> "/root/.pex/install/twitter.common.exceptions-0.3.7-py2-none-any.whl.f6376bcca9bfda5eba4396de2676af5dfe36237d/twitter.common.exceptions-0.3.7-py2-none-any.whl/twitter/common/exceptions/__init__.py",
>>>>>>>  line 1    26, in _excepting_run
>>>>>>>  63     self.__real_run(*args, **kw)
>>>>>>>  64   File "apache/aurora/executor/status_manager.py", line 62, in run
>>>>>>>  65   File "apache/aurora/executor/aurora_executor.py", line 235, in 
>>>>>>> _shutdown
>>>>>>>  66   File 
>>>>>>> "/root/.pex/install/twitter.common.concurrent-0.3.7-py2-none-any.whl.f1ab836a5554c86d07fa3f075905c95fb20c78dd/twitter.common.concurrent-0.3.7-py2-none-any.whl/twitter/common/concurrent/deferred.py",
>>>>>>>  line 5    6, in defer
>>>>>>>  67     deferred.start()
>>>>>>>  68   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 745, in start
>>>>>>>  69     _start_new_thread(self.__bootstrap, ())
>>>>>>>  70 thread.error: can't start new thread
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Vinod Kone <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you share the agent and executor logs of an example orphaned
>>>>>>>> executor? That would help us diagnose the issue.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Mohit Jaggi <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>> Often I see some orphaned executors in my cluster. These are cases
>>>>>>>>> where the framework was informed of task loss, so has forgotten about 
>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>> as expected, but the container(docker) is still around. AFAIK, Mesos 
>>>>>>>>> agent
>>>>>>>>> is the only entity that has knowledge of these containers. How do I 
>>>>>>>>> ensure
>>>>>>>>> that they get cleaned up by the agent?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mohit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to