Hi again,

Can anybody guide me in checking if the httpclient-auth.xml file is loaded
properly? Everything seems to be working fine up to the point of getting the
credentials from the httpclient-auth.xml file.
Can anybody send a working httpclient-auth.xml file on their installation
just for sanity check?

I still don't see any reason for my setup not to work. Don't have any clue
what could go wrong. I tested websites with both Basic and NTLM Auth
schemes. Neither works and the log file complains as if I haven't provided
the credentials in httpclient-auth.xml.


Thanks,
Max


-----Original Message-----
From: Lewis John Mcgibbney [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: den 19 september 2012 21:42
To: [email protected]; Max Dzyuba
Subject: Re: HTTP Authentication (basic) in Nutch 1.5

Best tool to use is the parsechecker, it is a quick neat way to see whether
your protocol/fetch/authentication is working then whether your parser is
extracting the text and metadata you require.

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Max Dzyuba <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi Lewis,
>
> I used that website as an example. I don't specify the exact website that
I was using. I'm 100% sure that my website requires authentication and the
credentials I provide are verified too. So there is something I'm missing in
trying to make it work.
>
> Please help.
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> MaxLewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]> wrote:Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Max Dzyuba <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>>
>> 2012-09-19 16:26:16,106 INFO  httpclient.HttpMethodDirector - No 
>> credentials available for BASIC 'realm'@host.org:80
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't understand why Nutch complains about "No credentials 
>> available for BASIC 'realm'@host.org:80" since I've set up the 
>> default credentials which should be used for any page that asks for
authentication.
>>
>
> If I follow the above link I get a popup box saying that the site does 
> not require authentication credentials and that it is trying to trick 
> me.
>
> Are you sure its not just this site and that another solution is required?
>
> Lewis



--
Lewis

Reply via email to