Hi, I was doing a tests with ALS and I noticed that if I persist the inner RDDs from a MatrixFactorizationModel the RDD is not replicated, it seems like the storagelevel is hardcoded to MEMORY_AND_DISK, do you think it makes sense to make that configurable? [image: Inline image 1]
- [MLLib] storageLevel in ALS Fernando O.
- Re: [MLLib] storageLevel in ALS Xiangrui Meng
- Re: [MLLib] storageLevel in ALS Fernando O.
- Re: [MLLib] storageLevel in ALS Sean Owen
- Re: [MLLib] storageLevel in ALS Fernando O.
