On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:45 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to use the Bigbank demo as a basis for providing custom > authorization policies for one of our applications. In that regard, I > have a few questions: > > > > 1) I've tried attaching intents to implementation.java (as > illustrated in the demo) and it works fine, but implementation.spring > does not work similarly. Is that implementation not supported in this > version? > > 2) I've tried attaching operation level intents for component > services and they don't seem to work correctly. Again, is that support > available? > > > > I'd be thankful if you pointed me in the right direction. > > > > Thank you. > > > > Subhendu Chatterjee > > > > > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged > information. > If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply > e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. > Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, > printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this > e-mail is strictly > prohibited and may be unlawful.
Hi Subhendu In theory the model part should work in as much that, in the model, SpringImplementation extends ImplememtationImpl and should provide suitable places to store intents and policy sets that appear in the composite file. As far as I know we don't have and tests or samples where intents are attached to implementation.spring. I expect this is because we don't yet have any policies that work with the spring implementation. Can you raise a JIRA for this and attach a simple test case to show that intents are not processed correctly. On your second point, which implementation type are you using in this case? Again I would expect the model processing to be fairly generic here but obviously something it going wrong. Add this to the test case and we'll take a look at it. Regards Simon
