> > Concerning the mentioned "implementation-bpel-jbpm module" (and as I am > > still a newbie to Tuscany/ODE): > > (a) Would such an implementation take a long time? and > > (b) Would it be envisioned for these coming days? > > This really depends on the level of understanding you have with JBPM > internals to create the extension, I'd certainly be able to help on > the Tuscany/SCA side.
Unfortunately, I never have used jBPM up till now. But having looked over the main concepts of jBPM, this product wouldn't achieve my envisioned goals (w/o any impl extensions), because (a) its WS-BPEL 2.0 module don't support BPEL4People PeopleActivity, and (b) a "human task management system" also would be required. Here it obviously would be "Tempo" which is not 100% WS-HumanTask conformant. Both aspects would already be available using ActiveBPEL as "external Tuscany enhancement". So, even if the integration of jBPM would be the more proper solution for Apache Tuscany, the "external" extension using ActiveBPEL 5.0 with its already implemented BPEL4People *and* WS-HumanTask subcomponents would be completely sufficient for my case. Here I "only" would be dealing with the incorporation of the existing components into Tuscany and less with concrete subsystem implementations. Envisioning the integratation of ActiveBPEL 5.0 as "implementation.bpel.activebpel" impl extension, and to ge a better picture of the workload to come, could someone please tell me what has to be done to achieve this goal as well as point me to the appropriate implemented Tuscany components and their documentation documents??? (A global sketching would be very helpful, if possible). I guess most of the work would be similar to the "implementation.bpel(.ode)" artifacts, wouldn't it? Thanks a lot for your explications. Best regards, Martin _______________________________________________________________________ Jetzt 1 Monat kostenlos! WEB.DE FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL für nur 17,95 EURO/mtl.!* http://dsl.web.de/?ac=OM.AD.AD008K13805B7069a
