On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Gregor Kiddie <[email protected]> wrote: > I did, and it threw up a few more exceptions (Mainly class cast exceptions). > > We've taken the decision to dump Tuscany though, the stability and speed > issues it was enforcing on us was getting intolerable. Rather than continuing > to struggle through, we re-wrote our transport layer using spring jms (Which > has only been a couple of days work). > > Anyone on the list, don't take this as an anti Tuscany post, it's not. If I > was using Web Services, I have no doubt we'd be happily using Tuscany with no > issues. I think the JMS implementation could do with a ton of work though... > > Gk. >
Hi Gregor Sorry to hear you didn't have success with Tuscany. If you have any stack traces still to hand that you haven't shared would you be prepared to post them so we can maybe improve it for the future? Thanks Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
