Nice. Totally absent in Java land.
On 7/17/06, Ron Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
System.Type instances have a GetConstructor() method which returns a
System.Reflection.ConstructorInfo object. ConstructorInfo instances
have a GetParameters() method which returns an array of ParameterInfo
objects. Some of the properties on the ParameterInfo object are:
Name:string
ParameterType:Type
Position:int
--- Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, I gotta read the docs. :-)
>
> BTW: What's the "argumentName" attribute for? Can C# introspect on
> the
> argument names?
>
> Cheers,
> Clinton
>
>
> On 7/17/06, Ron Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > DataMapper 1.5 supports this notation (IBATISNET-155):
> >
> > <resultMap id="account-result-constructor" class="Account" >
> > <constructor>
> > <argument argumentName="id" column="Account_ID"/>
> > <argument argumentName="firstName" column="Account_FirstName"/>
> > <argument argumentName="lastName" column="Account_LastName"/>
> > </constructor>
> > </resultMap>
> >
> > --- Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > In Java land I was thinking of simply adding the following to the
> > > current
> > > <result> element...
> > >
> > > Currently we can do:
> > >
> > > <result property="FirstName" column="FIRST_NAME" />
> > >
> > > I'd like to add...
> > >
> > > <result field="_firstName" column="FIRST_NAME"/> <!-- I'm
> not
> > > advocating underscores -->
> > >
> > > ...and...
> > >
> > > <result column="FIRST_NAME" />
> > >
> > > The latter (which lacks both property and field attributes) would
> be
> > > a
> > > constructor parameter. It would have to follow some rules:
> > >
> > > 1) Constructor results must come first in the result map
> defn.
> > > 2) Constructor results must be in the same order as the
> > > parameters of
> > > the constructor.
> > >
> > > I think constructor and field support would be awesome in both
> the
> > > .NET and
> > > Java versions.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Clinton
> >
>
